Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

2003-06-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Mark J Cox wrote: For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix

Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

2003-06-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:47 AM 6/27/2003, Mark J Cox wrote: For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from

Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

2003-06-27 Thread Henri Gomez
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html

Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)

2003-06-27 Thread Mark J Cox
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro 8.0 and 9.0, just read : http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix security updates