Mark J Cox wrote:
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro
8.0 and 9.0, just read :
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that
explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix
At 06:47 AM 6/27/2003, Mark J Cox wrote:
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro
8.0 and 9.0, just read :
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that
explanation - Apache is far from
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro
8.0 and 9.0, just read :
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro
8.0 and 9.0, just read :
http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that
explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix security
updates