Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

Let's wait for our US based colleagues to wake up and have a cup of coffee or two... > Am 13.11.2019 um 14:01 schrieb Steffen : > > What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ? > > Steffen > > >> Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing >> het volgende geschr

Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ? Steffen > Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing > het volgende geschreven: > >> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen : >> >> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". >> >> I do not foresee expanding fu

Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen : > > > > > +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". > > I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, > tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. > > The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling.

Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

+1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable". I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc. The implemented stapling is great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. Also I like the mod_status information. Tested /branches/v2.2