Re: AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
ted. Yes this is true. The question is: Is this wrong? If this is considered wrong, we need to split ap_proxy_get_worker into two functions or we need to add a boolean parameter longest_match to it. In the case of the request processing we need longest match whereas in the configuration case me m

Re: AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Plüm wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jean-frederic Clere Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 14:21 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: ap_proxy_get_worker Hi, Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - Nor

Re: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jean-frederic Clere wrote: > > Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - > Shouldn't it give the exact match - > No, because most of the times the URL isn't an "exact" mat

AW: ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-frederic Clere > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 14:21 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: ap_proxy_get_worker > > > Hi, > > Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - > Shouldn'

ap_proxy_get_worker

2006-07-12 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Hi, Why does ap_proxy_get_worker() gives the best matched worker? - Shouldn't it give the exact match - Cheers Jean-Frederic