Re: apr_ bndm? was Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-29 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:11:01 -0500 Akins, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Needs to be against apr trunk and httpd trunk? Oh, er, um ... porting over to APR? That'd need to be raised on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I read your original post as ap_bndm, meaning httpd core. -- Nick Kew Application

Re: apr_ bndm? was Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-29 Thread Akins, Brian
On 11/28/07 8:27 PM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't looked at that specifically, but I think it likely there's a good case for it. Are you volunteering to hack up a patch? Sure. Why not. Needs to be against apr trunk and httpd trunk? -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer

Re: apr_ bndm? was Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-29 Thread Akins, Brian
On 11/29/07 8:23 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, er, um ... porting over to APR? That'd need to be raised on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I read your original post as ap_bndm, meaning httpd core. I can just do ap_bndm. Just to keep it on this list... Any particular place we are sticking

apr_ bndm? was Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-28 Thread Akins, Brian
Should we also break out the bndm stuff from mod_include as well? I have used in a few modules. -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer Turner Digital Media Technologies

Re: apr_ bndm? was Re: Expression Parser API?

2007-11-28 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:19:42 -0500 Akins, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we also break out the bndm stuff from mod_include as well? I have used in a few modules. I haven't looked at that specifically, but I think it likely there's a good case for it. Are you volunteering to hack up a