On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments
> > regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of
> > questions about this.
>
> I'm -0 on it, because using Scri
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unless anyone strenuously objects, I'm adding back the comments
> regarding ScriptInterpreterSource. We're getting an increasing number of
> questions about this.
I'm -0 on it, because using ScriptInterpretersource registry without further
explanation of the fla
At 01:40 PM 6/13/2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>For the record, I'm -0 on this. I don't see the point. Our distribution
>tarballs already expand the SSI's in the manual anyway.
Concur 100% [also -0]. While we can add additional helpful config examples
by way of commented-out config blocks, addit
For the record, I'm -0 on this. I don't see the point. Our distribution
tarballs already expand the SSI's in the manual anyway.
--Cliff
On 13 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bnicholes2002/06/13 11:39:04
>
> Modified:docs/conf httpd-win.conf httpd-std.conf.in httpd-nw.conf
>
