Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Use ap_str_tolower for lowercasing the scheme.
That was the original intention (not apr_tolower).
Can you please not mix formatting changes with code changes? Those
spurious changes make it a lot tougher to review. Th
--On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 8:24 AM + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2004/08/24 01:24:18
Modified:modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Use ap_str_tolower for lowercasing the scheme.
That was the original intention (not apr_tolower).
Can you please not mix formatting changes with
Unless I'm missing something, this patch would make the
proxy vulnerable to a DoS. An attacker could cause the
httpd to buffer an arbitrarily large amount of data simply
by sending an arbitrarily large request body, right?
Brian
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:55, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Any objections
> "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES
> >modules/proxy proxy_http.c
> > Log:
> > Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow
Jeff Trawick wrote:
"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
Bill
jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph
"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
>
> Bill
>
> jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
>
> Modified:.CHANGES
>modules/proxy proxy_http.c
> Log:
> Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph th
Any objections to porting this to 2.0?
Bill
jerenkrantz2002/12/08 21:37:27
Modified:.CHANGES
modules/proxy proxy_http.c
Log:
Rewrite how proxy sends its request to allow input bodies to morph the request
bodies. Previously, if an input filter changed the r
--On Friday, November 08, 2002 12:25:20 -0800 Brian Pane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
put it. We don't necessarily want to reset the request
Content-Length whenever we create a subrequest, because
somebody might have a legitimate need to read the form
post data within a server-side-included subreq
I agree: it probably should be at a higher level. For now,
I made the change as localized as possible, in order to get
the proxy problem fixed quickly without breaking anything
else. But eventually the fix should probably be in the core.
The only problem is that I'm not sure where it's safe to
pu
It seems like this patch should be at a higher level. Don't we also
have problems with POST to any other sort of included subrequest
being transformed into a GET but retaining the content-length
or other irrelevant (nasty) headers?
Is there a more appropriate place to make this correction for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> When doing a GET of a proxied URL as a subrequest within
> a POSTed request, don't send the original POST's Content-Length
> as part of the header for the GET.
>
Good catch! I was puzzling over some weird crud I was seeing and
this nailed it.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> ap_proxy_http_request needs to check the return status of ap_pass_brigade
Does the same problem exist in proxy_ftp?
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"There's a moon
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 04:59:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ianh01/11/18 08:59:38
>
> Modified:modules/proxy proxy_http.c
> Log:
> Add extra If-XXX request headers to be ignored in subrequests
> Allow cache-control header to get passed to subrequests
> tabs -> space
Graham Leggett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> p_conn->close += ap_proxy_liststr(apr_table_get(r->headers_in,
>>"Connection"),
>>
> "close");
>
>> +/* sub-requests never use keepalives */
>> +if (r->main) {
>> +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>p_conn->close += ap_proxy_liststr(apr_table_get(r->headers_in,
> "Connection"), "close");
> +/* sub-requests never use keepalives */
> +if (r->main) {
> +p_conn->close++;
> +}
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
