Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2004-01-15 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
Cool :) Just one note that's worth preserving in the archives. When you get into these kind of numbers, you start running out of spare TCP ports and have to start listening on multiple addresses. On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:42:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gregames2004/01/15 07:42:38

Re: -DFOREGROUND (was cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2002-04-04 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: trawick 02/04/03 05:45:58 Modified:server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: prefork MPM: add -DFOREGROUND option to use when you want the parent process to run in the

-DFOREGROUND (was cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2002-04-03 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: trawick 02/04/03 05:45:58 Modified:server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: prefork MPM: add -DFOREGROUND option to use when you want the parent process to run in the foreground (NO_DETACH is a special mode for running

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2002-02-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: gregames02/02/10 06:21:44 Modified:.CHANGES server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: prefork shouldn't be killing its parent if a child runs out of resources. Since this is necessary for daedalus anyway, this should be in any

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2002-02-10 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 02:21:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gregames02/02/10 06:21:44 Modified:.CHANGES server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: prefork shouldn't be killing its parent if a child runs out of resources. Revision ChangesPath

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-14 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 06:18 am, Bill Stoddard wrote: On Tuesday 13 November 2001 02:37 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:39:30AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: I'm starting from a different place I guess. I see the core as defining the client interface for TCP.

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-14 Thread Bill Stoddard
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 06:18 am, Bill Stoddard wrote: On Tuesday 13 November 2001 02:37 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:39:30AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: I'm starting from a different place I guess. I see the core as defining the client interface for

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-14 Thread Bill Stoddard
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: core_output_filter does buffering based on mimimum write thresholds, checks for iovec limits and multiple file buckets, and splits brigades accordingly, etc. These functions would remain in core_output_filter. The network_out_filter would

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-14 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Wednesday 14 November 2001 10:57 am, Bill Stoddard wrote: On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: core_output_filter does buffering based on mimimum write thresholds, checks for iovec limits and multiple file buckets, and splits brigades accordingly, etc. These functions would

MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-13 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 07:15:36AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rbb 01/11/12 23:15:36 Modified:include http_connection.h server connection.c core.c server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: This allows modules to add socket descriptors to the

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-13 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 02:37 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:39:30AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: Don't think of it as removing the socket usage from the MPM. The point of this is to augment what the MPM is doing. Here's my point, the core already does all of the

Re: MPM design abuse (was: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c)

2001-11-13 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Tuesday 13 November 2001 04:38 pm, dean gaudet wrote: i tend to agree with greg... this all seems to be contrary to the original MPM goals which was to provide a method of accessing the fastest and most scalable socket - worker mapping on each platform. it looks like you're making all the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2001-11-12 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Monday 12 November 2001 11:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rbb 01/11/12 23:15:36 Modified:include http_connection.h server connection.c core.c server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: This allows modules to add socket descriptors to the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2001-11-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: trawick 01/11/10 20:37:11 Modified:server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: in prefork, listensocks[0] doesn't have a pod this fixes FREQUENT segfaults in prefork when you have more than one listening socket I just noticed a couple of minor nits in the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2001-11-10 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Saturday 10 November 2001 09:17 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: trawick 01/11/10 21:17:51 Modified:server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: minor tweaks to pass a parm of the right type to apr_poll() and to use i for an iterator in both listensocks[] loops Sorry about that. All

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/prefork prefork.c

2001-11-10 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Saturday 10 November 2001 12:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rbb 01/11/10 00:00:41 Modified:server/mpm/prefork prefork.c Log: Move prefork to the same API as the rest of the MPMs for setting up listeners. This has been on my plate for a few months now, but I had to