On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
+qi = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*qi));
+memset(qi, 0, sizeof(*qi));
As we said, if you are concerned about the performance aspect
of apr_pcalloc, then we should fix apr_pcalloc NOT attempt to
work
Comments inline.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 01:45:00AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.16 +108 -0httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/fdqueue.c
Index: fdqueue.c
===
RCS file:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
+qi = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*qi));
+memset(qi, 0, sizeof(*qi));
As we said, if you are concerned about the performance aspect
of apr_pcalloc, then we should fix apr_pcalloc NOT attempt to
work around its
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 07:39:24PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
I was going to complain about the addition of yet another mutex
to the critical path of request processing, but it got me thinking
about an approach to making worker faster: shorten the time spent
in the mutex-protected region.
Yes!
