Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

* Bill Stoddard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > AIX doesn't understand -maxdepth. Yeah, it seems to be a gnuism. -Thom

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > AIX doesn't understand -maxdepth. neither do several other platforms, as was stated relatively soon after the commit it looks like Sander gave up on anybody fixing it and yanked the code from stable a few days ago > > wsanchez2002/11/28 23:21:07

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

AIX doesn't understand -maxdepth. > > wsanchez2002/11/28 23:21:07 > > Modified:server .cvsignore Makefile.in >.acinclude.m4 > Log: > If apr and apr-util are not in-tree, we need to be able to find the > include directory for each in order to generate the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > wsanchez2002/11/28 23:21:07 > > Modified:server .cvsignore Makefile.in >.acinclude.m4 > Log: > If apr and apr-util are not in-tree, we need to be able to find the > include directory for each in order to generate the server/exp

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

>remove me from maillist plz Please look at the emails' headers. It says: list-unsubscribe: And for the next time: once is enough. Thanks, nice evening, johannes -- A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle. - http://jgcl.at/ko/ - new photos from summer

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:54 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 > At 08:31 PM 8/9/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > >>Cool. I believe something is better than nothing :). > >> > >>(I'm sure you're already aware of this - but thought it'd be

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

remove me from maillist plz - Original Message - From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 200

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

remove me from maillist plz - Original Message - From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 > +1. This seems too restricti

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 10:33:06AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > I am documenting the entire release process from start to finish > so that the RMs doing the following releases have something to guide > them through. I'll also include some tips like 'be reluctant to > include last minute patches

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 August 2002 06:55 > At 08:31 PM 8/9/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> Cool. I believe something is better than nothing :). >>> >>> (I'm sure you're already aware of this - but thought it'd be better to let >>> you know) >>> I belie

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

At 08:31 PM 8/9/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>Cool. I believe something is better than nothing :). >> >>(I'm sure you're already aware of this - but thought it'd be better to let >>you know) >>I believe my patch went into r1.127 - and has been labelled for the 2.0.40 >>release. So, you might want

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

> Cool. I believe something is better than nothing :). > > (I'm sure you're already aware of this - but thought it'd be better to let > you know) > I believe my patch went into r1.127 - and has been labelled for the 2.0.40 > release. So, you might want to bump the label before it's released. It h

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

+1. This seems too restrictive to me. People *do* patch the source as well :) Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > -1. Please revert the change. The purpose of the check is to identify > incompatible APIs, not security holes. > > Roy > --

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

> -1. Please revert the change. The purpose of the check is to identify > incompatible APIs, not security holes. I have a patch to turn it into a warning -- will commit once tested. Roy

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

>> -1. Please revert the change. The purpose of the check is to identify >> incompatible APIs, not security holes. > > should apache be allowed to be built against a version of OpenSSL that > has a > known problem - I don't think so. But if everybody thinks against - then, > so > be it. Peopl

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

-Original Message- From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:03 PM >-1. Please revert the change. The purpose of the check is to identify >incompatible APIs, not security holes. should apache be allowed to be built against a version of OpenSSL tha

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

-1. Please revert the change. The purpose of the check is to identify incompatible APIs, not security holes. Roy

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

quot;OpenSSL "0.[[1-9]][[0-9]]* ) ap_cv_ssltk="`(cd $p/.. && pwd)`" break -Original Message- From: Ian Holsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 CHANGES

On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:42:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > That would only work if we looked in those variable for the files. But, > we don't, so we have to special case this stuff. We should re-write big > portions of the detection logic so that we don't have ANY hard-coded > paths, but I am

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 CHANGES

> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Look for OpenSSL libraries in /usr/lib64. > ... > > for p in $ap_ssltk_base/lib /usr/local/openssl/lib \ > > - /usr/local/ssl/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /lib; do > > + /usr/local/ssl/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4 CHANGES

> Look for OpenSSL libraries in /usr/lib64. ... > for p in $ap_ssltk_base/lib /usr/local/openssl/lib \ > - /usr/local/ssl/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /lib; do > + /usr/local/ssl/lib /usr/local/lib /usr/lib /lib /usr/lib64; do If we just told people to add the right

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

On 22 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rbb 01/08/22 13:34:40 > > Modified:.acinclude.m4 > Log: > We always need to include the openssl specific directory in the INCLUDES > variable. > Ahhh, thank you. Just that very instant I'd run up against this bug and was scra