On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
> hmm, at the moment seems it does not:
> http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.0-docs/
> shows up only files with 45 bytes
Broken on HEAD?
$ lynx -dump -head http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.0-docs/
[chop]
Content-Length: 20
Content
Hi,
>>> Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot?
>> Done. Should be available on the next snapshot (roughly every 6 hours).
>> Yell if it doesn't work. -- justin
> It does. Thank you very much.
hmm, at the moment seems it does not:
ht
>> Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot?
> Done. Should be available on the next snapshot (roughly every 6 hours).
> Yell if it doesn't work. -- justin
It does. Thank you very much.
Kess
Günter Knauf wrote:
but would be fine if we could have _one_ complete archive as snapshot, then you dont have to care about BRANCH, HEAD..
I'm sure lot more people would try to build from cvs if they could get _one_ archive containing all...
That has prevented me from building from cvs so I'd l
--On Saturday, November 29, 2003 11:38 PM +0100 Günter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots
httpd-2.1_xxx and put them into http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.1/
and the APACHE_2_0_BRANCH named as httpd-2.0_xxx i
--On Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:39 PM +0100 Astrid Keßler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot?
Done. Should be available on the next snapshot (roughly every 6 hours).
Yell if it doesn't work. -- justin
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> and then we also need a second APR snapshot for APACHE_2_0_BRANCH, or?
> It's AP[RUI]_0_9_BRANCH for apr,apr-util,apr-iconv. And soon to be
> AP[RUI]_1_0_BRANCH as well, with HEAD becoming 1.1-dev.
hm, some more confusing stuff for people not follo
Günter Knauf wrote:
Justin,
means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside
the 2.1 snapshots (HEAD).
<http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.0/>
thanks!!
But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots httpd-2.1_xxx and
pu
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
> and then we also need a second APR snapshot for APACHE_2_0_BRANCH, or?
It's AP[RUI]_0_9_BRANCH for apr,apr-util,apr-iconv. And soon to be
AP[RUI]_1_0_BRANCH as well, with HEAD becoming 1.1-dev.
--Cliff
Justin,
> means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside
> the 2.1 snapshots (HEAD).
> <http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.0/>
thanks!!
But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots httpd-2.1_xxx and
put them into http:/
> I've tweaked cvs.apache.org's snapshot scripts to include branches. This
> means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside the
> 2.1 snapshots (HEAD).
Great idea. Thank you, Justin.
Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot?
Kess
Hi all,
I've tweaked cvs.apache.org's snapshot scripts to include branches. This
means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside the
2.1 snapshots (HEAD).
<http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.0/>
Enjoy! -- justin
Seems *real* slow... taking me ages to do simple updates.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
wil
Hi all,
Seems the automated http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ directory is
missing httpd-ldap - can someone add it to the list?
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"There's a moon
over Bour
Why is cvs.apache.org running 2.0.18?
Ryan
--
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Francisco, CA
15 matches
Mail list logo
