Paul Querna wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote:
Greetings,
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll()
/ kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of
which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large
Greetings,
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large number of fd's to be polled and linear
Saju Pillai wrote:
Greetings,
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() /
kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of
which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large number of fd's to be
Paul Querna wrote:
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll()
/ kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of
which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large number of fd's to be polled and
On 02/03/06, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the
Saju Pillai wrote:
On 02/03/06, *Greg Ames* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on
epoll()
/ kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons
because of
which
On 02/03/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote: On 02/03/06, *Greg Ames* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll() / kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons