On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Gnter Knauf wrote:
> forgot to ask: I assume that apr and apr-util are the same for both trees??
For now they are, yes.
Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
forgot to ask: I assume that apr and apr-util are the same for both
trees??
currently
and if you wait a few more minutes until the recent merge of
out-of-tree-apr actually works, you can use the same copy of apr with
both trees (until 2.1-dev steps up to apr 1.0)
* G?nter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hi,
> forgot to ask: I assume that apr and apr-util are the same for both trees??
>
yes.
Hi,
forgot to ask: I assume that apr and apr-util are the same for both trees??
G.
Hi Erik,
> you'll have to check out the 2.0 branch instead of HEAD:
> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic co -d httpd-2.0.45
> -r
> APACHE_2_0_BRANCH httpd-2.0
works fine!
thanks, Guenter.
At 08:31 AM 3/11/2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
>Hi,
>just wanted to compile 2.0.45 (need it because of 3rd-party module lower MMN) but I
>dont know how to get it:
>- http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ has only 2.1-dev, but its named 2.0
>- http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ also only shows 2.1-dev, but
> From: Günter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi,
> just wanted to compile 2.0.45 (need it because of 3rd-party module lower MMN)
> but I dont know how to get it:
> - http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ has only 2.1-dev, but its named 2.0
> - http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ also only shows 2.1-dev,
Hi,
just wanted to compile 2.0.45 (need it because of 3rd-party module lower MMN) but I
dont know how to get it:
- http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ has only 2.1-dev, but its named 2.0
- http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ also only shows 2.1-dev, but named httpd-2.0
- cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECT
