On 12/08/2007 04:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I didn't see this patch in the commit list but did see it referred
to in the 2.2 STATUS file... I'm reviewing the patch now but two
things did stick out:
-apr_brigade_cleanup(ctx-ctxbb);
-APR_BUCKET_REMOVE(b);
-
I didn't see this patch in the commit list but did see it referred
to in the 2.2 STATUS file... I'm reviewing the patch now but two
things did stick out:
-apr_brigade_cleanup(ctx-ctxbb);
-APR_BUCKET_REMOVE(b);
-APR_BRIGADE_INSERT_TAIL(passbb, b);
-
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The reason why the current code handles FLUSH separately
is though, yes, the ap_pass_brigade is done at the end of
the while loop, that is *only* done when we're done handling
the full brigade... The intent was to honor flushes in the
brigade
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:39 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
In fact the patch does all this as it passes the passbb brigade down
the chain after *each* processed bucket of the original brigade
(the ap_pass_brigade is at *the end* of the while loop *not* after
the while loop).
I didn't catch that when
