Re: interesting Win32 PR 23982: "Apache 2.xx is incompatible with Winsock 2.0"

Playing with this patch... seems to work w/minimal performance penalty... Bill Index: sendrecv.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/network_io/win32/sendrecv.c,v retrieving revision 1.64.2.1 diff -u -r1.64.2.1 sendrecv.c --- sendrecv.c 13 Fe

Re: interesting Win32 PR 23982: "Apache 2.xx is incompatible with Winsock 2.0"

Jeff Trawick wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 07:12 AM 6/21/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about why Apache 2.0 doesn't get along with layered service providers. See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 Can some Win32

Re: interesting Win32 PR 23982: "Apache 2.xx is incompatible with Winsock 2.0"

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 07:12 AM 6/21/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about why Apache 2.0 doesn't get along with layered service providers. See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 Can some Win32-savant have a look a

Re: interesting Win32 PR 23982: "Apache 2.xx is incompatible with Winsock 2.0"

At 07:12 AM 6/21/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: >There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about why Apache 2.0 >doesn't get along with layered service providers. > >See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 > >Can some Win32-savant have a look at this and respond?

interesting Win32 PR 23982: "Apache 2.xx is incompatible with Winsock 2.0"

There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about why Apache 2.0 doesn't get along with layered service providers. See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982 Can some Win32-savant have a look at this and respond?