Re: libapreq within mod_transform

2006-01-28 Thread Christian Parpart
> > At least the homepage[1] looks promising in its feature set as it (in > > fact) does what we need right now. > > > > secondly: is libapreq able to retrieve POST arguments from a filter > > module, specifically mod_transform? > > Yes, what mod_transform needs to do is create a filter-init funct

Re: libapreq within mod_transform

2006-01-28 Thread Joe Schaefer
Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > my problem is not the extra depend on apreq, but what I can't find really > neat, is, that it seems to be a perl module (based on mod_perl somehow) and > IIRC, mod_transform shouldn't be overbloated by depends that itself > depend on too much the a

libapreq within mod_transform (was: Re: ap_unescape_url() and the '+' within an argument)

2006-01-28 Thread Christian Parpart
On Sunday 29 January 2006 00:59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Christian Parpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Saturday 28 January 2006 23:36, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Christian Parpart wrote: > >> > wich works so far, however, firefox keeps adding '+' chars instead of >