From: Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:20 PM
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 11:03 AM
From: Ben Hyde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:20 PM
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into:
According to Greg Stein:
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into: ./httpd-2.0.31-alpha/
+1!
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - Don't hate yourself in the morning
Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:34:51PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
...
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
A superstitious behavior involving
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Greg Stein:
Why can't we name our damned tarballs and resulting directories like all
other packages out there?
For example: httpd-2.0.31-alpha.tar.gz
unpacks into: ./httpd-2.0.31-alpha/
+1!
I just built it with the ./httpd_roll_release script
so if