William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[...]
>>>The reason I'm asking is that in CNET's case (and probably other corporate
>>>web-sites)
>>>most of these things would be set only once, and all the merges are just a
>>>waste of CPU.
>>>
>
>Not anymore ;) That is, we might have a few merges, but they are
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:42 PM
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 04:06:56PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > hey guys.
> >
> > just got a simple question.
> >
> > What would the ramifications be if we changed the config options from
> > 'directory speci
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 04:06:56PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
>>hey guys.
>>
>>just got a simple question.
>>
>>What would the ramifications be if we changed the config options from
>>'directory specific' to 'server' specific.
>>
>>I mean what functionality would we lose
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 04:06:56PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> hey guys.
>
> just got a simple question.
>
> What would the ramifications be if we changed the config options from
> 'directory specific' to 'server' specific.
>
> I mean what functionality would we lose if we were just able to set
hey guys.
just got a simple question.
What would the ramifications be if we changed the config options from
'directory specific' to 'server' specific.
I mean what functionality would we lose if we were just able to set all this
options once (server wide)
The reason I'm asking is that in CNET's
