Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Tim Bray
provide an iterator function so you can walk through the things that have been stored in reverse-chronological order. ...I think. Yeah, mod_atom could do that, and the amount of re- engineering would be tolerable. I'm a bit dubious, because if you want an Atom store that puts things i

Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Paul Querna
sh bits at a >> server and leave the server in control of where things go. I'm trying >> to imagine what the storage hooks might look like. As for end-user >> display, I doubt it; there are all sorts of excellent blogging & >> publishing engines out there that tak

Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Ian Holsman
e storage hooks might look like. As for end-user display, I doubt it; there are all sorts of excellent blogging & publishing engines out there that take care of that for you and httpd doesn't need to compete with. APP & mod_atom are narrowly focused at the problem of resource CR

Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Tim Bray
ks might look like. As for end- user display, I doubt it; there are all sorts of excellent blogging & publishing engines out there that take care of that for you and httpd doesn't need to compete with. APP & mod_atom are narrowly focused at the problem of resource CRUD.

Re: Testing frameworks [was: mod_atom]

2007-06-27 Thread Issac Goldstand
Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/27/07, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Paul, do you know offhand what the difference is between the >> perl-framework, and perl.apache.org's Apache::Test framework? I'm >> familiar with the latter, and have found it to be an amazing tool for >> testing Ap

Re: Testing frameworks [was: mod_atom]

2007-06-27 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 6/27/07, Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul, do you know offhand what the difference is between the perl-framework, and perl.apache.org's Apache::Test framework? I'm familiar with the latter, and have found it to be an amazing tool for testing Apache modules written in all langua

Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:44:42 -0700 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Bray wrote: > > Passes lots of tests, but still lots of work to do: written up at > > (extreme) length here: > > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/06/25/mod_atom Nice writeup!

Re: Testing frameworks [was: mod_atom]

2007-06-27 Thread Issac Goldstand
Paul, do you know offhand what the difference is between the perl-framework, and perl.apache.org's Apache::Test framework? I'm familiar with the latter, and have found it to be an amazing tool for testing Apache modules written in all languages (and web applications of any sort running on Apache),

Re: mod_atom

2007-06-27 Thread Paul Querna
Tim Bray wrote: > Passes lots of tests, but still lots of work to do: written up at > (extreme) length here: > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/06/25/mod_atom > > I don't know if httpd needs this mod_atom, but I suspect that it'll need > some mod_atom or

mod_atom

2007-06-26 Thread Tim Bray
Passes lots of tests, but still lots of work to do: written up at (extreme) length here: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/ 2007/06/25/mod_atom I don't know if httpd needs this mod_atom, but I suspect that it'll need some mod_atom or another before too long. It would be ni