Hi,
looking around for static analysis tools, I arrived on a commercial
software that states that is has already found some mistakes in httpd.
Reading it, I noticed one of their example found in libhttpd. This
example was against return value from 'accept'.
I looked in httpd for similar con
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking around for static analysis tools, I arrived on a commercial software
> that states that is has already found some mistakes in httpd.
Christophe brings up a good point. Has the httpd project ever had its
code analyzed by
Le 15/07/2012 12:24, Tom Browder a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
Hi,
looking around for static analysis tools, I arrived on a commercial software
that states that is has already found some mistakes in httpd.
Christophe brings up a good point. Has the http
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking around for static analysis tools, I arrived on a commercial software
> that states that is has already found some mistakes in httpd.
>
> Reading it, I noticed one of their example found in libhttpd. This example
> was aga
On 7/15/2012 3:24 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Christophe JAILLET
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> looking around for static analysis tools, I arrived on a commercial software
>> that states that is has already found some mistakes in httpd.
>
> Christophe brings up a good point.
After running the Apache-2.0.58 server on mod_cgid on HPUX B.11.23 PA for 3-4
days all of sudden I see the following errors in error_log.
"[Fri Mar 16 07:23:53 2007] [error] (231)Software caused connection abort:
Error accepting on cgid socket"
There were 18 millons such entries in 30 minutes
On 3/17/07, Amol Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running the Apache-2.0.58 server on mod_cgid on HPUX B.11.23 PA for 3-4
days all of sudden I see the following errors in error_log.
"[Fri Mar 16 07:23:53 2007] [error] (231)Software caused connection abort: Error
accepting on cgid socket"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 6:05:33 AM
Subject: Re: mod_cgid and accept() loop
On 3/17/07, Amol Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After running the Apache-2.0.58 server on mod_cgid on HPUX B.11.23 PA for 3-4
> days all of sudden I
On 3/18/07, Amol Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just have to make sure the daemon will be relaunched taking on
requests without
problem if that happens.
Yes (not tested exactly like that however). Certainly the cgid daemon
would be relaunched if it crashed.
