Re: Mention mod_disk_cache --> mod_cache_disk in upgrading.html for 2.4 ?

2013-02-02 Thread Graham Leggett
On 02 Feb 2013, at 9:22 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > looking at an old PR 39351 > (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39351), I was searching > for some information about the removal of mod_disk_cache from 2.4. > > My understanding is that mod_cache_disk replaced it, but co

Mention mod_disk_cache --> mod_cache_disk in upgrading.html for 2.4 ?

2013-02-01 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Hi, looking at an old PR 39351 (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39351), I was searching for some information about the removal of mod_disk_cache from 2.4. My understanding is that mod_cache_disk replaced it, but couldn't find any information about it in the documentation.

Re: mod_disk_cache -> mod_cache_disk

2010-11-20 Thread Graham Leggett
On 14 Oct 2010, at 8:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: The naming of mod_disk_cache currently goes against the naming convention of other grouped modules in the server, such as mod_proxy_*, and mod_socache_*. Are there any objections to me renaming mod_disk_cache to mod_cache_disk for httpd v2

Re: mod_disk_cache -> mod_cache_disk

2010-10-14 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/14/2010 05:12 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > The naming of mod_disk_cache currently goes against the naming > convention of other grouped modules in the server, such as mod_proxy_*, > and mod_socache_*. > > Are there any objections to me renaming mod_disk_cache to mod_cache_disk

mod_disk_cache -> mod_cache_disk

2010-10-14 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, The naming of mod_disk_cache currently goes against the naming convention of other grouped modules in the server, such as mod_proxy_*, and mod_socache_*. Are there any objections to me renaming mod_disk_cache to mod_cache_disk for httpd v2.4? Regards, Graham --