Re: mod_mbox attachment handling

2007-07-28 Thread Chris Haumesser
> This should be fixed in r560612. > > The change has been deployed to mail-archives.apache.org; so the JPEG image > in > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-axis-user/200704.mbox/raw/%3C46 >[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 Awesome -- Thanks!!

Re: mod_mbox attachment handling

2007-07-28 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 7/17/07, Chris Haumesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the above still an accurate statement of attachment handling status in > > mod_mbox? If so, does anyone know what it would take to add this > > functionality? Anyone interested in helping us for a modest bounty? This should be fixed i

Re: mod_mbox attachment handling

2007-07-17 Thread Paul Querna
Chris Haumesser wrote: > --- > mod_mbox has now a brand new and complete MIME parser. The attachment > downloading is still to be implemented, but it's really no big deal > considering the data structures generated by the mbox_mime_decode_multipart() > function. > --- > > Is the above stil

Re: mod_mbox attachment handling

2007-07-17 Thread Chris Haumesser
Just in case your mailer mangles my sample URL, see: http://tinyurl.com/392g7l On Tuesday 17 July 2007 15:15:25 Chris Haumesser wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to help a client improve its list archives. They've been using > mailman with pipermail for many years, and pipermail is problematic in many

mod_mbox attachment handling

2007-07-17 Thread Chris Haumesser
Hi, I'm trying to help a client improve its list archives. They've been using mailman with pipermail for many years, and pipermail is problematic in many ways. We like the look and feel of mod_mbox, and would like to deploy it. However, it doesn't seem to handle common attachments correctly