On Feb 9, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
* Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-09 23:56:34]:
I have no further knowledge in the mbox code, but the value of len
does not look good
to me. Are the values of len for other cores of a similar magnitude?
My last commits fix th
* Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-09 23:56:34]:
> I have no further knowledge in the mbox code, but the value of len does not
> look good
> to me. Are the values of len for other cores of a similar magnitude?
My last commits fix this bug. The length was indeed wrong because a MIME
su
On 02/09/2006 10:56 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I hadn't checked in a while, but there seem to be lots of mod_mbox
> cores on ajax again. Here's one backtrace:
>
> #0 mbox_cte_escape_html (p=0x60343ca8,
> s=0x602f5a68
> "--_=_NextPart_00
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:56:53PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I hadn't checked in a while, but there seem to be lots of mod_mbox
> cores on ajax again. Here's one backtrace:
>
> #0 mbox_cte_escape_html (p=0x60343ca8,
>
I hadn't checked in a while, but there seem to be lots of mod_mbox
cores on ajax again. Here's one backtrace:
#0 mbox_cte_escape_html (p=0x60343ca8,
s=0x602f5a68
"--_=_NextPart_001_01C3C08D.F854E1E0\nContent-Type:
text/html;Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\n\n
Hi,
After some problems with SORBS, I can finally answer.
* Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-04 22:09:28]:
> >(gdb) print r->finfo->fname
> >$1 = 0x6041b937
> >"/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >
>
> The source .mbox for this message id is:
> ws-axis-c-dev/200503.mbox
Quite funny actua
Sander Temme wrote:
... in /raid1/httpd-cores. I have made them 644 for perusal. There
appears to be a core every couple of days, from the 2.1.10 image that
was running on the box until tonight.
Unless I'm doing something wrong with gdb, they're not very useful.
Here's a backtrace from core.1
... in /raid1/httpd-cores. I have made them 644 for perusal. There
appears to be a core every couple of days, from the 2.1.10 image that
was running on the box until tonight.
Unless I'm doing something wrong with gdb, they're not very useful.
Here's a backtrace from core.11358:
#0 mbox_c
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 06:32:59PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
I get undefined references to core apache functions. Can you tell me
how you do it? (I can probably just steal the one from your home
directory anyway.)
Sounds like you're probably getting bit by AP_DEB
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 06:32:59PM -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I get undefined references to core apache functions. Can you tell me
> how you do it? (I can probably just steal the one from your home
> directory anyway.)
Sounds like you're probably getting bit by AP_DEBUG. FWIW, Sander
Temme'
Paul Querna wrote:
I have run mod_mbox on 2.1 & 2.3-dev on my dev machine just fine.
I just compiled mod_mbox and httpd 2.1.10 in my home directory on
Ajax... seemed to compile fine.
I get undefined references to core apache functions. Can you tell me
how you do it? (I can probably just
Paul Querna wrote:
> Joshua Slive wrote:
>> Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
>>> * Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-25 15:04:51]:
>>>
>>>
I hadn't checked in a while, but I now see we have lots of
httpd-cores related to mod_mbox on ajax. Most of them look like this:
#0 mbox_mi
Joshua Slive wrote:
> Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
>> * Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-25 15:04:51]:
>>
>>
>>> I hadn't checked in a while, but I now see we have lots of
>>> httpd-cores related to mod_mbox on ajax. Most of them look like this:
>>>
>>> #0 mbox_mime_decode_body (p=0x6
Hi,
* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-26 17:09:51]:
> Looks good so far.
>
> Can someone give me instructions on how to compile mod_mbox for 2.1/2.2?
> I'm trying to push ajax up to 2.1.10, but I can't get it to work with
> "configure
> --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache-install/www.apac
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-25 15:04:51]:
I hadn't checked in a while, but I now see we have lots of httpd-cores
related to mod_mbox on ajax. Most of them look like this:
#0 mbox_mime_decode_body (p=0x6042e508, cte=CTE_NONE, body=0x0,
len=0)
* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-25 15:04:51]:
> I hadn't checked in a while, but I now see we have lots of httpd-cores
> related to mod_mbox on ajax. Most of them look like this:
>
> #0 mbox_mime_decode_body (p=0x6042e508, cte=CTE_NONE, body=0x0,
> len=0) at mod_mbox_mime.
I hadn't checked in a while, but I now see we have lots of httpd-cores
related to mod_mbox on ajax. Most of them look like this:
#0 mbox_mime_decode_body (p=0x6042e508, cte=CTE_NONE, body=0x0,
len=0) at mod_mbox_mime.c:290
#1 0x2101ada0 in mbox_mime_get_body (p=0x6042
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On August 23, 2005 10:50:45 AM -0400 Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've had to turn off core dumps from httpd on ajax, because they were
quickly filling up our /tmp directory.
Below is another backtrace that appears a little different from the
first. (I
--On August 23, 2005 10:50:45 AM -0400 Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had to turn off core dumps from httpd on ajax, because they were
quickly filling up our /tmp directory.
Below is another backtrace that appears a little different from the
first. (I don't believe the module on
I've had to turn off core dumps from httpd on ajax, because they were
quickly filling up our /tmp directory.
Below is another backtrace that appears a little different from the
first. (I don't believe the module on ajax has been upgraded with the
last fix either.)
Joshua.
#0 mbox_cache_ge
20 matches
Mail list logo
