Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: news Im Auftrag von Bill Barker
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 05:07
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
Not strictly true, it's just that it's never graduated from
experimental
due to lack of user
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performance improvement. obtained at the expense of added
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Stoddard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it
provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13
On Thu, June 14, 2007 3:27 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performance improvement. obtained
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Stoddard
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp
