Hi,
* John K. Sterling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> As justin said, this is something that has been randomly discussed from
> time to time for many years now. MANY people see the need for this for
> obvious reasons.
>
> As for the STATUS file entry, the concrete meaning (from a high level):
>
>-- Original Message --
>From: Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Nonetheless, I'd like to know who the person(s) are that are behind the
>statement in the STATUS file so that I can find out what it is (exactly)
>that they mean and what (if any) history there is to the idea. "session
>cache store sh
Hi (again :-),
* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> --On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> >>* session cache store should be pluggable
> >
> >I'd like to speak with the person who's behind this, as I'm waiting for
>
> (Par
--On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
linking apache. I'm wondering if the above problem is a consequence of
us explicitly setting linker syntax and not letting autotools do their
job properly? Anyway, the patch is there if someone wants to see if it
