+1
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 5:43 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/3/24 4:32 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also
>>> reduce our library dependen
On 4/3/24 4:32 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also
>> reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in
>> mod_systemd (thus loading lib
On 02 Apr 2024, at 11:25, Rainer Jung wrote:
> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also
> reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in mod_systemd
> (thus loading libsystemd and all of its dependencies), but instead taking the
> approach
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also
> reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in
> mod_systemd (thus loading libsystemd and all of its dependencies), but
> i
Hi there,
in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should
also reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in
mod_systemd (thus loading libsystemd and all of its dependencies), but
instead taking the approach to hard code sd_notify functionality.
I
