mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q

2011-04-29 Thread David Dabbs
Hello. The first "Patch Proposed To Backport from Trunk" in 2.2.x trunk STATUS is: * mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q; move back to FIFO rather than LIFO, for more consistent performance so that older requests don't suffer Trunk pat

Re: mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q

2011-04-29 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/29/2011 11:43 AM, David Dabbs wrote: > Hello. > > The first "Patch Proposed To Backport from Trunk" in 2.2.x trunk STATUS is: > > * mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q; > move back to FIFO rather than LIFO, for more consiste

Re: mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q

2011-04-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:04 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 4/29/2011 11:43 AM, David Dabbs wrote: >> Hello. >> >> The first "Patch Proposed To Backport from Trunk" in 2.2.x trunk STATUS is: >> >>   * mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) c

Re: mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q

2011-05-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
> > * mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q; >move back to FIFO rather than LIFO, for more consistent performance >so that older requests don't suffer >Trunk patch (applies for worker): > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=

Re: mpm worker/mpm event: Revert an old (~10yr) change to the fd Q

2011-05-06 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/29/2011 10:43 AM, David Dabbs wrote: > > I'd like to put in a vote for this to be applied to 2.2.x (2.2.18). > We think we're seeing performance anomalies similar to those referenced in > the discussion threads regarding these patches. David, the vote did not pass for the next 2.2.18 resul