Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The point of the accept abstraction is to allow people to poll on things other
> than regular sockets. The pipe-of-death is just one such example. An SSL
> socket is another, as is a UDP socket, or a hundred other examples. We
> should just move the pi
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:52 pm, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It looks like listen_recs aren't allocated from the right pool with
> > worker? (at least I couldn't reproduce this with prefork)
>
> And the answer is...
>
> *Most* of the listen_recs a
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like listen_recs aren't allocated from the right pool with
> worker? (at least I couldn't reproduce this with prefork)
And the answer is...
*Most* of the listen_recs are allocated from the right pool. The one
that isn't is the pipe of death
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:55:11AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > (Yes, this is without any patches :) )
> >
> > I'll take a look at this after I get to a stopping point with the
> > server-limit/thread-limit stuff.
> >
> > It looks like listen_recs a
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:55:11AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (Yes, this is without any patches :) )
>
> I'll take a look at this after I get to a stopping point with the
> server-limit/thread-limit stuff.
>
> It looks like listen_recs aren't allocated from the right pool with
> worker? (at l
(Yes, this is without any patches :) )
I'll take a look at this after I get to a stopping point with the
server-limit/thread-limit stuff.
It looks like listen_recs aren't allocated from the right pool with
worker? (at least I couldn't reproduce this with prefork)
Program received signal SIGHU
