On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Sorry, I had no intention to send this offlist.
>
Well, I really strayed here, I just realize now this is the wrong list.
Sorry again Daniel and httpd folks, I'll now restate all that to the apr
list :)
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> After r64861: native atomics are disabled (forcibly) on those CPUs,
>> whatever --enable-nonportable-atomics is.
>>
>
> Sorry, --enable-nonportable-atomics is still honored, I misread t
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> After r64861: native atomics are disabled (forcibly) on those CPUs,
> whatever --enable-nonportable-atomics is.
>
Sorry, --enable-nonportable-atomics is still honored, I misread the code.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Daniel Lescohier <
> daniel.lescoh...@cbsi.com> wrote:
>
>> I see this in configure.in:
>>
>> AC_ARG_ENABLE(nonportable-atomics,
>> [ --enable-nonportable-atomics Use optimized atomic code which may
>> produce
Sorry, I had no intention to send this offlist.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yann Ylavic
Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: nonportable-atomics configure.in setting
To: Daniel Lescohier
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Daniel Lescohier
wrote:
> I see this
