From another thread Re: one word syncronize once more, new thread
created as I also don't believe the issues are related.
Greg Ames wrote:
if you have a hung server, I would do some more diagnosis and not get
sidetracked by MRPC. have you looked for unusual messages in the error
log
word syncronize once more
Greg Ames wrote:
please see rev. 558039. requests_this_child does not need to be 100%
accurate. the cure below is worse than the disease.
Greg
-requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */
+apr_atomic_dec32
please see rev. 558039. requests_this_child does not need to be 100% accurate.
the cure below is worse than the disease.
Greg
- Original Message
From: Dmytro Fedonin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 11:49:42 AM
Subject: one word syncronize once
Greg Ames wrote:
please see rev. 558039. requests_this_child does not need to be 100% accurate.
the cure below is worse than the disease.
Greg
-requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */
+apr_atomic_dec32(requests_this_child); /* much slower than
Hi all,
I've got some response which shows that I was not clear enough in my previous
post. Fullproof solution would be:
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
===
--- server/mpm/worker/worker.c (revision 545597)
+++
