Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
For a start, I've got these changes exposed in between those 2 dates:
http://www.apac
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
For some reason, your output doesn't match mine. for me the difference
between 22nd and 23 starts from 3428 [1] and goes into the next day,
which is not included in your output:
[1] http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/2004-09-22+23/3428.patch
I've apparently been bitten
Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
For a start, I've got these changes exposed in between those 2 dates:
http://www.apac
Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
For a start, I've got these changes exposed in between those 2 dates:
http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/20
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
For a start, I've got these changes exposed in between those 2 dates:
http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/2004-09-22+23/
That's
Stas Bekman wrote:
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
For a start, I've got these changes exposed in between those 2 dates:
http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/2004-09-22+23/
--
I did some binary search and found that:
mp2-20040922 - no core
mp2-20040923 - core
So we need to diff these two checkouts...
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guid
Stas Bekman wrote:
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
modperl-2.0 'make test' running under worker mpm (linux) always fails in
t/filter/both_str_req_add.t and dumps core:
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
#1 0xbfffeff8 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ??
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
modperl-2.0 'make test' running under worker mpm (linux) always fails in
t/filter/both_str_req_add.t and dumps core:
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
#1 0xbfffeff8 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ?? ()
#3 0xbfffeff7 i
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> modperl-2.0 'make test' running under worker mpm (linux) always fails in
> t/filter/both_str_req_add.t and dumps core:
>
> #0 0xe410 in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xe410 in ?? ()
> #1 0xbfffeff8 in ?? ()
> #2 0x0001 in ?? ()
> #3 0xbfffeff7 in ?
modperl-2.0 'make test' running under worker mpm (linux) always fails in
t/filter/both_str_req_add.t and dumps core:
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0xe410 in ?? ()
#1 0xbfffeff8 in ?? ()
#2 0x0001 in ?? ()
#3 0xbfffeff7 in ?? ()
#4 0x4030536b in __read_nocancel () from /lib/tls/
>> I'm seeing a segfault during child process shutdown with the
>> worker MPM on Solaris. It appears to happen because the worker
>> threads do this:
>>
...
>> or:
>> * add an apr_status_t to the apr_thread_t struct, and store the
>>exit status there
>
> +1, and I have a patch to do this
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:54:00AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
> I'm seeing a segfault during child process shutdown with the
> worker MPM on Solaris. It appears to happen because the worker
> threads do this:
>
> static void *worker_thread(apr_thread_t *thd, void * dummy)
> {
>proc_info * ti =
I'm seeing a segfault during child process shutdown with the
worker MPM on Solaris. It appears to happen because the worker
threads do this:
static void *worker_thread(apr_thread_t *thd, void * dummy)
{
proc_info * ti = dummy;
int process_slot = ti->pid;
int thread_slot = ti->tid;
14 matches
Mail list logo
