Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Index: alloc.c === RCS file: /e/apache/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -u -d -r1.145 alloc.c --- alloc.c 20 Jun 2003 15:05:40 - 1.145 +++ alloc.c 29 Jul 2003

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-04 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Index: alloc.c === RCS file: /e/apache/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -u -d -r1.145 alloc.c --- alloc.c 20 Jun 2003 15:05:40 - 1.145 +++ alloc.c

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-04 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Unix entity is still hanging around (for you) unless you (the parent) successfully fetched its status. So the important point here is that a child process cannot just disappear (for whatever reasons!) and even be replaced until the parent has

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-04 Thread Bill Stoddard
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Unix entity is still hanging around (for you) unless you (the parent) successfully fetched its status. So the important point here is that a child process cannot just disappear (for whatever reasons!) and even be replaced until

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-02 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Index: alloc.c === RCS file: /e/apache/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -u -d -r1.145 alloc.c --- alloc.c 20 Jun 2003 15:05:40 - 1.145

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-02 Thread Bill Stoddard
Cliff Woolley wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Index: alloc.c === RCS file: /e/apache/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/alloc.c,v retrieving revision 1.145 diff -u -d -r1.145 alloc.c --- alloc.c 20 Jun 2003 15:05:40

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-08-02 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Bill Stoddard wrote: - if (ap_os_kill(p-pid, SIGTERM) == -1) { -p-kill_how = kill_never; -} -else { - need_timeout = 1; -} + ap_os_kill(p-pid, SIGTERM); + need_timeout = 1; So you

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-07-29 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote: For those not watching the bugzilla notices, I direct your attention to bug 21737: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21737 Apparently there has been a regression in 1.3.28 from 1.3.27 whereby CGI scripts are getting left around as

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-07-21 Thread Adam Warner
Hi Cliff Woolley, For those not watching the bugzilla notices, I direct your attention to bug 21737: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21737 Apparently there has been a regression in 1.3.28 from 1.3.27 whereby CGI scripts are getting left around as zombies when suexec is

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-07-21 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Adam Warner wrote: Just a long shot but is the regression in 2.0.47 as well? I've been getting defunct processes with nothing being served and the clincher is that all my HTML pages are served via CGI/suexec. While it's certainly possible it's broken in 2.0.47, it's

suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-07-20 Thread Cliff Woolley
For those not watching the bugzilla notices, I direct your attention to bug 21737: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21737 Apparently there has been a regression in 1.3.28 from 1.3.27 whereby CGI scripts are getting left around as zombies when suexec is in use, apparently

Re: suexec+CGI = zombies in 1.3.28

2003-07-20 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote: For those not watching the bugzilla notices, I direct your attention to bug 21737: Oops, Joshua already posted about this. Sorry about the dupe. :)