On 20 Dec 2011, at 9:34 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
-PROGRAMS= $(PROGRAM_NAME)
-TARGETS = $(PROGRAMS) $(shared_build) $(other_targets)
+sbin_PROGRAMS = $(PROGRAM_NAME)
+TARGETS = $(sbin_PROGRAMS) $(shared_build) $(other_targets)
Yow. That defies every naming
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 20 Dec 2011, at 9:34 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
-PROGRAMS = $(PROGRAM_NAME)
-TARGETS = $(PROGRAMS) $(shared_build) $(other_targets)
+sbin_PROGRAMS = $(PROGRAM_NAME)
+TARGETS =
On 20 Dec 2011, at 3:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
None of these require the user to be administrator, except to use the
apxs -i option. Not really sure if these make sense. Any pointers to
a decent canonical definition of sbin v bin?
You're right, the current split doesn't seem to make much
On 12/20/2011 7:23 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 20 Dec 2011, at 3:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
None of these require the user to be administrator, except to use the
apxs -i option. Not really sure if these make sense. Any pointers to
a decent canonical definition of sbin v bin?
You're
On 12/20/2011 5:35 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
This is the standard convention that's used by automake, I'm not keen on
inventing another arbitrary format if I can avoid it:
Ahhh.
We don't speak automake :)
I find the convention very irritating, but will leave it at that
and let others chime
On 12/19/2011 11:27 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/Makefile.in
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/Makefile.in?rev=1220867r1=1220866r2=1220867view=diff
==
