On Apr 15, 2014, at 1:51 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>
> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> @@ -136,6 +179,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> 2.4.x patch: trunk works
> http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/uds-rewrite.patch
> +1: jim, humbedooh
>
On 4/15/2014 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I can't recall... isn't the issue still being worked an
> additional aspect of mod_rewrite and UDS; that is, a new
> behavior to be added (or handled) rather than a "broken"
> behavior.
That was my understanding, too
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Oh, didn't mean to vote -1, just wanted to add a note on the stuff
> being worked that could be integrated in the backport.
I am (re)working on this currently.
Oh, didn't mean to vote -1, just wanted to add a note on the stuff
being worked that could be integrated in the backport.
I can make another proposal anyway, sorry for the noise.
Corrected in r1587758.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2014, at 1:51 PM, yla...@a
