On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to get my 2.4.x reviews in.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the change, but wasn't the previous
behavior more desirable?
If the entry were within its expiry, those same headers wouldn't have
been sent to the client
Trying to get my 2.4.x reviews in.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the change, but wasn't the previous
behavior more desirable?
If the entry were within its expiry, those same headers wouldn't have
been sent to the client (well, none but the first who filled in the
cache). Why should it act
