On 4/15/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:02:35PM -0700, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote:
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment
from a kernel developer:
We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:02:35PM -0700, Wilfredo Snchez Vega wrote:
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment
from a kernel developer:
We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking.
Inspecting the socket, so_state is 0x182 (0x100 is
We're investigating possible issues in the system. One comment
from a kernel developer:
We are returning EWOULDBLOCK because the socket is in non-blocking.
Inspecting the socket, so_state is 0x182 (0x100 is SS_NBIO).
Setting
a breakpoint on soioctl for SS_NBIO I can clearly see
On Apr 6, 2005 8:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wsanchez
Date: Wed Apr 6 17:22:29 2005
New Revision: 160348
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160348
Log:
In emulate_sendfile(), handle APR_EAGAIN from apr_socket_send().
-rv =
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005 8:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wsanchez
Date: Wed Apr 6 17:22:29 2005
New Revision: 160348
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=160348
Log:
In emulate_sendfile(), handle APR_EAGAIN from apr_socket_send().
-rv =
