Ah, should read my inbox to the end. Thanks William for straightening this out.
-Stefan
> Am 09.06.2016 um 09:54 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
>> Am 08.06.2016 um 15:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>>
>>> It is just a remark that we should move forward and either backport
>>> ap_cstr_casecmp[n] or
> Am 08.06.2016 um 15:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>> It is just a remark that we should move forward and either backport
>> ap_cstr_casecmp[n] or decide to delay it to another release.
>
> I'd really prefer that it be added to this release... But I also
> know that there's some overlap w/ APR
> It is just a remark that we should move forward and either backport
> ap_cstr_casecmp[n] or decide to delay it to another release.
I'd really prefer that it be added to this release... But I also
know that there's some overlap w/ APR and that always causes
delays.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 07/06/2016 à 06:59, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
> christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>> ap_casecmpstr breaks 2.4.x build.
Le 07/06/2016 à 06:59, William A Rowe Jr a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET
mailto:christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>>
wrote:
ap_casecmpstr breaks 2.4.x build.
Keep strncasecmp for now? (waiting for ap_cstr_casecmp[n])
Le 06/06/2016 à 21:11, j...@a
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> ap_casecmpstr breaks 2.4.x build.
> Keep strncasecmp for now? (waiting for ap_cstr_casecmp[n])
>
> Le 06/06/2016 à 21:11, j...@apache.org a écrit :
>
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Mon Jun 6 19:11:20 20
ap_casecmpstr breaks 2.4.x build.
Keep strncasecmp for now? (waiting for ap_cstr_casecmp[n])
CJ
Le 06/06/2016 à 21:11, j...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jim
Date: Mon Jun 6 19:11:20 2016
New Revision: 1747056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1747056&view=rev
Log:
Merge r1744206 from tru