> On Jun 30, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special?
>
> It fixes a regression in the last release, I think it's close enough
> in spirit as a showstopper.
+1.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special?
It fixes a regression in the last release, I think it's close enough
in spirit as a showstopper.
2017-06-30 17:34 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion :
> On 06/30/2017 08:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> -1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it.
>>
>> Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special?
>>
>
> It's a reinstatement of my previous 2.4.26 showst
On 06/30/2017 08:10 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
-1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it.
Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special?
It's a reinstatement of my previous 2.4.26 showstopper, which got no
objections, was unaddressed by the prop
-1 on showstopper. It's a bug, no security implications, cope with it.
Thousands of bugs pass through STATUS, what makes yours special?
That said, unconditional +1 to any mod_proxy_fcgi.c patches you or Jim or
any committers determine for backport, I'd prefer we treat the module as
experimental u