On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> You describe the inconsistency in case c->data_in_input_filters is 1,
> I did for the case that c->data_in_input_filters is 0, but yes we could have
> inconsistencies in both cases
> and the question is if they are always fine. So far it
On 07/20/2018 03:49 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 07/20/2018 02:38 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/19/2018 12:36 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>
> -if
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 07/20/2018 02:38 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/19/2018 12:36 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
-if (!c->data_in_input_filters || ap_run_input_pending(c) != OK)
On 07/20/2018 02:38 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 07/19/2018 12:36 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> -if (!c->data_in_input_filters || ap_run_input_pending(c) != OK) {
>>> +if (ap_run_input_pending(c) != OK) {
>>
>> We have
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 07/19/2018 12:36 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> -if (!c->data_in_input_filters || ap_run_input_pending(c) != OK) {
>> +if (ap_run_input_pending(c) != OK) {
>
> We have a different code flow here now. If
On 07/19/2018 12:36 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Wed Jul 18 22:36:19 2018
> New Revision: 1836239
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1836239=rev
> Log:
> core: integrate data_in_{in,out}put_filter to ap_filter_{in,out}put_pending().
>
> Straightforward for
