Re: svn commit: r289593 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/os/unix/os.h

2005-09-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: Sounds reasonable, +0 then but please wait until it's been reviewed before putting it on the 2.2.x branch. 2.2.x branch is CTR, no? But I indended to ask before moving forward with the matching #define's of 0 value and changing the various tests throughout httpd to test #if

Re: svn commit: r289593 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/os/unix/os.h

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:15:50PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:07:04PM -, William Rowe wrote: > >> I'd prefer, before 2.2-final, to have AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS defined > >> across all architectures as 1|0. Comments? > > > >-0, it's a bikeshed wh

Re: svn commit: r289593 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/os/unix/os.h

2005-09-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:07:04PM -, William Rowe wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Fri Sep 16 09:07:01 2005 New Revision: 289593 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=289593&view=rev Log: I'd prefer, before 2.2-final, to have AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS defined across all archi

Re: svn commit: r289593 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/os/unix/os.h

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:07:04PM -, William Rowe wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Fri Sep 16 09:07:01 2005 > New Revision: 289593 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=289593&view=rev > Log: > > I'd prefer, before 2.2-final, to have AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS defined > across all archit