On 1/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Mon Jan 2 08:52:58 2006
> New Revision: 365376
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=365376&view=rev
> Log:
> Avoid magic numbers. Since we are reading the header, let's
> be explicit about it. Also removes the need
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> On 1/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: jim
> > Date: Mon Jan 2 08:52:58 2006
> > New Revision: 365376
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D365376&view=3Drev
> > Log:
> > Avoid magic numbers. Since we are reading the header, let's
On 1/3/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >
> > On 1/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Author: jim
> > > Date: Mon Jan 2 08:52:58 2006
> > > New Revision: 365376
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D365376&view=3Drev
> > >
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> The problem isn't just the number of bytes we read off the wire, it's
> also that if the compiler has introduced padding between elements of
> the struct when you recv directly into the struct the data is not
> aligned with the proper members, so when you later access it
