Re: svn commit: r393032 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2006-04-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 4/11/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: On 4/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This pool is or is not created in the parent? If its the parent it's gotta be proc mutexed even if using prefork. It is created in the parent and used

Re: svn commit: r393032 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2006-04-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
This pool is or is not created in the parent? If its the parent it's gotta be proc mutexed even if using prefork. If it's process-local, then please don't depend on APR_THREADED, please please please poll the MPM to determine if the mpm has_threads? It's a huge waste for prefork users with a

Re: svn commit: r393032 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2006-04-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 4/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This pool is or is not created in the parent? If its the parent it's gotta be proc mutexed even if using prefork. It is created in the parent and used only during request processing. Why does it need to be proc mutexed? Each process