Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/4/2006 2:42 AM >>>
>Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
>>> Should we define our own macro which uses LDAP_SECURITY_ERROR or
the
>>> more detailed logic, to keep the mainline code cleaner and support
>>> reuse in other paths
>>
>> I thought about that and couldn't real
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Should we define our own macro which uses LDAP_SECURITY_ERROR or the
more detailed logic, to keep the mainline code cleaner and support
reuse in other paths
I thought about that and couldn't really decide if we should define the
LDAP_SECURITY_ERROR macro in the ldap header
>>> On 6/3/2006 at 5:45 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jeff
Trawick"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: bnicholes
>> Date: Fri Jun 2 15:01:53 2006
>> New Revision: 411306
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411306&view=rev
On 6/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Fri Jun 2 15:01:53 2006
New Revision: 411306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411306&view=rev
Log:
Fix a problem with invalid auth error detection for LDAP client SDKs that don't
support LDAP_SECURITY_ERROR ma
