Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2007-02-16 Thread Stuart Children
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: -1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you are asking us to vote on :-? (veto removal automatic upon availability of the link to the specific patch you plan to commit that actually applies, and probably my review pretty quickly, too.) Trunk patch

AW: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2007-02-16 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF EITO
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stuart Children Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Februar 2007 12:40 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: -1 as is, Jim would you -please- post the actual patch you

Re: AW: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2007-02-16 Thread Stuart Children
Plüm wrote: It applies to 2.2.x, but this is about 2.0.x where the trunk version does NOT work cleanly. Ah, whoops - I didn't notice this thread was 2.0 and the other 2.2. My mistake. Indeed, 2.2.x and trunk have an additional configuration directive over 2.0.x (proxy_status) which is what's

Re: svn commit: r507955 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

2007-02-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: +* mod_proxy: ProxyTimeout (and others) ignored due to not merging + the *_set params. + PR# 11540 + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=507516 + (Note: includes some not applicable to 2.0.x) + +1: