On 5/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ rpluem : Now that CacheIgnoreQueryString has been backported r538807
+ applies cleanly to 2.2.x. So I assume it is ok to use
+ r538807 instead of max-age-2.2.x.patch.
Aye - that's fine and just
On 05/17/2007 11:28 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 5/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> + rpluem : Now that CacheIgnoreQueryString has been backported
>> r538807
>> + applies cleanly to 2.2.x. So I assume it is ok to use
>> + r53
On 5/17/07, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Roy has already voted for it before I added my comment, I just wanted to give
him a chance to give a comment if he thinks that this is needed (in the same
way as
I wanted to give you a chance to comment). But in this simple case it may not
On May 17, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/17/2007 11:28 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 5/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ rpluem : Now that CacheIgnoreQueryString has been
backported
r538807
+ applies cleanly to 2.2.x. So I assume
