On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:44 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Submitted by: rpluem
Reviewed/backported by: jim
Hi Jim,
Could you please return to the traditional way of noting this,
namely
Submitted by: Ruediger Pluem
Reviewed by: jim, minfrin
We already know who backported it (the committer) and
Maybe it would be helpful to put a template into STATUS. Or somewhere
else and put a pointer to it there, anyway.
Dan
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:14 -0700, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com
wrote:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:44 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Submitted by: rpluem Reviewed/backported by:
I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that...
But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste
from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing
the orig svn logs and using that, but I can maybe figure
out some way of cutting that out as well, automagically.
On Aug
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that...
But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste
from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing
the orig svn logs and using that, but I can maybe figure
out some way of
On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that...
But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste
from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing
the orig svn logs
