Nick Kew wrote:
>
> Regarding r883540 itself, I've just taken a look at it.
> It seems to enforce the same mutex type on all modules that
> use a mutex. Can't see an obvious reason not to do that, but
> it might merit discussion on-list. For example, maybe someone
> has a good reason to use diff
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Many if not all other functions which handle directives and which are
> not implemented in the same file as the directive declaration also
> have the ap_ prefix, so I don't follow you on the "public" aspect.
s/public/meant to be exported/
> But most of these other functio
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
traw...@apache.org wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h Tue Nov 24 19:06:16 2009
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
const char **mutexfile);
/* private function to process the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:50 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> traw...@apache.org wrote:
>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h Tue Nov 24 19:06:16 2009
>> @@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
>> const char **mute
traw...@apache.org wrote:
> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/util_mutex.h Tue Nov 24 19:06:16 2009
> @@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
> const char **mutexfile);
>
> /* private function to process the Mutex directive *
