On Tuesday 20 July 2010, Nick Kew wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 07:43, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > Is this needed any longer? Shouldn't authz be expected to handle
> > r->user == NULL after Stefans recent changes?
I have reverted the change that the auth_checker hook is also called
with r->user == NU
On 20 Jul 2010, at 07:43, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Is this needed any longer? Shouldn't authz be expected to handle r->user ==
> NULL after Stefans
> recent changes?
Hadn't considered that. An extra check here can't hurt, can it?
--
Nick Kew
On 07/20/2010 03:34 AM, n...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Tue Jul 20 01:34:39 2010
> New Revision: 965709
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=965709&view=rev
> Log:
> Don't risk segfault in authz if r->user is not set
> PR 42995
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>
