On 08/17/2010 05:42 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Oliver wrote:
>> Note that it is an option, not a default setting. The problem with
>> the heartbeat bit which Red Hat/JBoss use is the unstandardized
>> proprietary protocol required (http://jboss.org/mod_cluste
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Oliver wrote:
> Note that it is an option, not a default setting. The problem with
> the heartbeat bit which Red Hat/JBoss use is the unstandardized
> proprietary protocol required (http://jboss.org/mod_cluster) with
> separate logic to manage it.
No, in 2
Note that it is an option, not a default setting. The problem with
the heartbeat bit which Red Hat/JBoss use is the unstandardized
proprietary protocol required (http://jboss.org/mod_cluster) with
separate logic to manage it.
The problem with the status url is that it doesn't accomplish the same
On Aug 16, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>>>
>>> This basicly sums up the downsides of this approach I see as well.
>>>
>>> IMHO to avoid a spec violation we can o
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>>
>> This basicly sums up the downsides of this approach I see as well.
>>
>> IMHO to avoid a spec violation we can only add the Expect header to
>> requests with request bodies.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
>
> This basicly sums up the downsides of this approach I see as well.
>
> IMHO to avoid a spec violation we can only add the Expect header to
> requests with request bodies. OTOH these requests hurt most when they
> fail as we cannot
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung
> Sent: Montag, 16. August 2010 16:40
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: trunk "ping" for http proxy
>
> On 16.08.2010 15:41, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > As many know, one thing I've wanted in h
On 16.08.2010 15:41, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As many know, one thing I've wanted in httpd's proxy for
http is a sort of pre-request ping option (ala what we
have for ajp) and nothing ever worked out fine, for a variety
of reasons.
Anyway, I've gone back to an idea I had a long while ago
and one whi
As many know, one thing I've wanted in httpd's proxy for
http is a sort of pre-request ping option (ala what we
have for ajp) and nothing ever worked out fine, for a variety
of reasons.
Anyway, I've gone back to an idea I had a long while ago
and one which ACO and Filip Hanik and I have played aro
