undesired modules loading

2012-08-18 Thread Roy T. Fielding
I built 2.4.3 with the options ./configure \ --prefix=$tdir \ --with-apr=$adir \ --with-apr-util=$adir \ --without-ssl \ --without-crypto \ --disable-cache \ --without-distcache \ --enable-maintainer-mo

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-18 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Roy, On 18.08.2012 22:07, Roy T. Fielding wrote: I built 2.4.3 with the options ./configure \ --prefix=$tdir \ --with-apr=$adir \ --with-apr-util=$adir \ --without-ssl \ --without-crypto \ --disable-cache \

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
It's '--enable-maintainer-mode' which introduces this behavior. When being built for mere mortals, we are much nicer as far as which modules are built and loaded by default Maybe --enable-maintainer-mode should be renamed --enable-developer-mode On Aug 18, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Roy T. Fielding

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-18 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Aug 18, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Yes, before 2.4.0 we introduced exactly this difference. All modules that > were build get a LoadModule line in the installed config, but most are > commented out. I don't have the list of modles active by default at hand > though. Ah, okay. >

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-19 Thread Rainer Jung
On 19.08.2012 00:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Aug 18, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Yes, before 2.4.0 we introduced exactly this difference. All modules that were build get a LoadModule line in the installed config, but most are commented out. I don't have the list of modles active by

Re: undesired modules loading

2012-08-19 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 19 August 2012, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Partial answer: the current semantics of maintainer-mode is (per > > configure help): > > > > "Turn on debugging and compile time warnings and load all > > compiled modules" > > Umm, WTF? Why? One reason was to make it easier for httpd develo