what about proxy? (was: Re: General Availability release qualities?)

2001-09-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:16:25PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > - Resolve the proxy situation. A lot of committers (FirstBill > > comes to mind) would like to see this come back in the core. > > If it is ready and the group consensus is to add it, then let's

Re: what about proxy? (was: Re: General Availability release qualities?)

2001-09-11 Thread Graham Leggett
Greg Stein wrote: > When you say placeholder, are you suggesting that you're going to commit the > code back into the httpd-2.0 branch? Yes - in the last (long) discussion it got the needed +1's, but it was never done. I've delayed actually committing the thing yet to make sure people have time

Re: what about proxy? (was: Re: General Availability release qualities?)

2001-09-11 Thread Chuck Murcko
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at 04:01 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism >> instead? >> Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module. > > We can do this too - but then I'd say we would need to finalise the >